A “clean” pentest report is not always enough. The real value often comes from explaining what attacks were attempted, what defenses held up, and why exploitation failed. That missing context is part of why AI alone struggles to replace experienced pentesters. Automated tools can surface findings, but security teams still need human judgment to understand coverage, resilience, and whether the environment was actually tested deeply. A senior pentester does more than identify weaknesses — they validate strengths. Without that feedback loop, “nothing found” can mean anything from excellent security to incomplete testing. As AI-generated security testing becomes more common, how do organizations verify that “no findings” actually means “well defended”? Subscribe to our podcasts: https://securityweekly.com/subscribe #PenTesting #SecurityWeekly #Cybersecurity #InformationSecurity #AI #InfoSec
Trust cues for videos
